He says: I didn’t mind it, and it would be good in the right situation, however, it’s not without its flaws.
She says: Overall, this wine had a lovely aroma and flavour profile.
|
||||
She says: This was a good value wine and easily the best out of the three. He says: For $16, I think it’s a bargain and worth a try, especially if you’re looking for an alternative to a budget bottle of Pinot Noir which keeps on disappointing you. 
She says: At nearly $40 a bottle, not even its papal history can justify this price tag for me. He says: There’s nothing particularly horrible about this wine, yet there’s nothing particularly great about it either. 
She says: This wine to me was a bit like a yo-yo. He says: This wine was a major letdown for me given the price and all the buzz in the Lower Mainland about this producer. 
She says: This wasn’t bad but I’d still prefer to drink a Cab Sauv if I had to drink a $20 Chilean red. He says: It’s not quite there yet, and needs more time in the bottle to settle down, lose some oak, and tame the stewed fruit. 
He says: A well-structured wine with strong acidity and finely-balanced tannins make this a great match for tomato-based Italian dishes or a take-out pizza. She says: Whilst it was the better of the two in this tasting, it appears to be developing at a slower rate than the 2005 which was drinking beautifully this time last year. 
She says: Not bad but nothing to get really excited about either. Unless you count the cool use of the figure 8 to create very distinctive labels… love the branding! He says: This Pinot Noir doesn’t blow me away, and it’s typical of the average BC style: solid red fruit, but very tight, and linear with little depth or complexity. |
|
 |
||
|
Copyright © 2013 WINEcouver - All Rights Reserved 
|
||||
